The end of the GLP-1 heyday? Hims’ $49 challenge and K-bio’s opportunity
2026-02-11

“$49 vs. $199”: the price war has begun

In February 2026, U.S. telehealth company Hims & Hers Health sent a jolt through the global pharmaceutical market. The compounded semaglutide pill it launched costs $49 (about KRW 70,000)for the first month and then $99 (about KRW 140,000)a month, a radical price point. That is less than half the $199 (about KRW 280,000) a month for the brand-name Wegovy pill.

On the news, Novo Nordisk shares plunged 6%, showing how shaken the market was. Novo Nordisk immediately called it “illegal mass compounding” and threatened legal action, but the market’s doubts about an “oligopoly” whose true face had already been exposed could no longer be contained.


Two sides of a $70 billion market: a goose that lays golden eggs vs. a patent swamp

The global obesity drug market reached $70 billion (about KRW 95 trillion) in 2025 and is expected to grow to $100 billion (about KRW 143 trillion)by 2030.

Surging from $15 billion in 2024 to $70 billion in 2025, it posted annual growth of 367%, an explosive pace.

Novo Nordisk: 75% revenue growth in three years and a legendary 45% operating margin

Table

Copy

YearRevenue (in $100 millions)Operating profit (in $100 millions)Net profit (in $100 millions)Operating margin
2022177695639.2%
20232321058445.3%
202429012910144.4%
202530913510243.6%

Novo Nordisk’s revenue surged 75% over three years, writing a “profit legend” for the pharma industry. In particular, its 2024 operating profit of $12.9 billionwas up 33.6% from the year before, and its operating margin of 44.4%shows profitability that outshines tech companies.

But the outlook for 2026 is grim. Novo Nordisk expects its 2026 revenue to fall 5–13%, and its shares plunged on the news.

It reflects a combination of intensifying competition in the obesity drug market and pressure from the U.S. government to cut drug prices.

Eli Lilly: Zepbound lifts it to No. 2, with 2026 revenue forecast at $80 billion

Table

Copy

YearRevenue (in $100 millions)Operating profit (in $100 millions)Net profit (in $100 millions)Operating margin
2022285716225.0%
2023341705220.6%
202445013510629.9%
202565217010626.1%

In 2024, Eli Lilly saw Zepboundgrow explosively, lifting revenue 45% year over year. It set 2026 revenue guidance at $80–83 billion, confidently beating the market consensus ($77.6 billion).

UBS kept its 2026 revenue forecast for Eli Lilly at $83.2 billionand set a price target of $1,250.

Cantor Fitzgerald raised its price target from $985 to $1,205 and kept its “overweight” rating.


The start of the 2026 patent expirations: the moment the monopoly crumbles

But a shadow is falling over this golden age. 2026, patents on GLP-1 drugs begin to expire in major countries.

  • Semaglutide (Wegovy/Ozempic): patents expire in 2026 in China, India, Brazil, Türkiye and Canada
  • U.S. and Europe: protected until the early 2030s, but pressure from copycat drugs is building in earnest

This is not just a date on a calendar. The moment patents lapse, dozens of copycat drugswill flood the market, and prices are likely to crash to 10–20% of current levels. Hims’ $49 pill is merely a “preview” that brings this future forward.


K-bio strikes back: is a Korean GLP-1 possible?

Korean biotech companies are not mere bystanders in the GLP-1 war. But the reality is tough.

Why can’t Korea make a GLP-1 drug?

  1. Patent barriers: the core patents on semaglutide and tirzepatide are valid into the 2030s, and developing a new compound that gets around them would take trillions of won in R&D and more than 10 years.
  2. Technology gap: long-acting technology for peptide drugs (extending half-life) and oral formulation technology (improving absorption) are areas monopolized by Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly.
  3. Economies of scale: Phase 3 trials require at least hundreds of billions of won, which most Korean biotechs are structurally unable to afford.

But there are gaps: “formulation innovation” and “multi-agonists”

Instead of a head-on fight, Korean companies are pursuing improved formulations andand multi-agonistsas a breakthrough.Table

Copy

CompanyPipelineFeaturesStage
Hanmi PharmaceuticalEfpeglenatideGLP-1/GCG dual agonistApplied for Korean marketing approval (December 2025); launch planned for the second half of 2026
D&D PharmatechDD01GLP-1/GCG receptor agonistIn Phase 2 trials in the U.S.
D&D PharmatechDD02S (using ORALINK)Oral GLP-1 with better absorption than RybelsusPhase 1; technology transfer to Metsera completed
PeptronMicrosphere formulationExtends dosing from once a week to once a monthJoint research with Eli Lilly
Inventage LabIVL-DrugFluidicOnce-monthly long-acting formulationJoint research with Boehringer Ingelheim
Ildong PharmaceuticalID110521156Oral small-molecule GLP-1Phase 1 completed; up to 13.8% weight loss after four weeks of dosing
RaphasMicroneedle patchPainless transdermal formulationIn development

Hanmi Pharmaceutical’s efpeglenatideis the first GLP-1 obesity drug developed in Korea and is set to launch in the second half of 2026. It is drawing attention for weight loss comparable to global Big Pharma drugs (up to 15% in Phase 2 trials).


Insurance coverage and price cuts: the future of the Korean market

Wegovy and Mounjaro are currently prescribed in Korea without national health insurance coverage, and the actual prices patients pay are as follows:Table

Copy

DrugDose4-week (1-month) supply priceActual patient cost (including prescription fee)
Wegovy0.25mgKRW 210,000–220,000About KRW 230,000–250,000
Wegovy2.4mgKRW 370,000About KRW 400,000–450,000
Mounjaro2.5mgKRW 278,000About KRW 300,000–350,000
Mounjaro5mgKRW 369,000About KRW 400,000–450,000
Mounjaro7.5mg+KRW 521,000About KRW 550,000–600,000

In August 2025, in response to Mounjaro’s launch, Wegovy cut its price by up to 42%, and at the starting dose (0.25mg) it is now actually cheaper than Mounjaro.

When will insurance cover it?

  • Second half of 2026–2027: after Hanmi Pharmaceutical launches efpeglenatide, national health insurance coverage may follow a health technology assessment (HTA)
  • Current situation: some private indemnity insurance may apply when prescribed for diabetes, but use for obesity treatment is entirely uncovered

Price decline scenarios

Table

Copy

ScenarioTimingExpected price (per 4 weeks)Market impact
Now2025KRW 210,000–600,000Accessible to the middle class; costs over KRW 1 million a year
Korean drug launches2026–2027KRW 150,000–400,000Price competition heats up; market grows 2–3 times
Copycat drugs take off2030KRW 50,000–150,000Goes mainstream; market grows 5–10 times

Key change: if today’s KRW 200,000–600,000 a month falls to KRW 50,000–150,000, annual treatment costs will drop from KRW 2.4–7.2 million to KRW 0.6–1.8 million. At that price, not just the middle class but also value-conscious consumers can enter the market.


Korean biotech stock outlook: who will lead?

Price targets and ratings for beneficiaries

Table

Copy

CompanyBrokerageTargetRatingKey catalysts
Hanmi PharmaceuticalHana SecuritiesKRW 640,000BuyEfpeglenatide launch (second half of 2026); hopes for technology transfer deals
Hanmi PharmaceuticalMeritz SecuritiesKRW 620,000BuyMultiple obesity and metabolic catalysts
Hanmi PharmaceuticalKyobo SecuritiesKRW 510,000(already exceeded)BuyHopes for partner pipelines at JPM
D&D PharmatechYuanta SecuritiesNot setNot RatedValidation of ORALINK technology; Metsera trial results
PeptronExpert viewsKRW 330,000–385,000BuyHopes the Eli Lilly technology evaluation deal becomes a full contract

Hanmi Pharmaceuticalhas an average brokerage price target of KRW 532,500, and Hana Securities, based on 2027 EBITDA, applied an EV/EBITDA multiple of 14.8 timesand set KRW 640,000as its price target.

This implies 18.3%of further upside from the current share price.

D&D Pharmatechmust prove the value of its ORALINK platform technology. LS Securities expressed optimism, calling 2025 “the year to prove the value of its oral platform.”

Peptroncould, if its technology evaluation deal with Eli Lilly becomes a full contract, see its shares rise two- to threefold , analysts expect. Experts are offering price targets in the KRW 330,000–385,000 range.


BITPRESS Insight: beyond the “innovator’s dilemma”

Hims’ $49 challenge is not just a price war. It is a symbolic event that illustrates the “innovator’s dilemma”. Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly invested billions of dollars to develop GLP-1 drugs and have enjoyed outsized profits in return. But now their success has produced a paradox: unequal access.

Who will win in the future?

  1. Generic and copycat drugmakers: they will benefit first in China and India, where patents start expiring in 2026. Names to watch include China’s Heoswi Pharmaceuticaland India’s Sun Pharma .
  2. Next-generation platform companies: the survivors will be companies that innovate rather than simply imitate, with oral formulations,, once-monthly long-acting drugs, Microneedle patch . In Korea, D&D Pharmatech’s ORALINK and Raphas’ patch technology fit this description.
  3. Digital health care platforms: telehealth companies such as Hims will go beyond supplying drugs to build a “weight management ecosystem”and create added value. Drugmakers will struggle to follow them there.

K-bio’s real opportunity

For Korean biotech companies, GLP-1 should be a chance not to “catch up” but to “leapfrog”. It is already too late to copy semaglutide. Instead, they need to transform the user experience with “peptides you can swallow,”, “once-a-month injections,”, “painless patches” and similar innovations.

If Korean companies capture just 10% of the $100 billion market in 2030, that is $10 billion (about KRW 14 trillion)in revenue, roughly equal to the total exports of Korea’s entire pharmaceutical industry today.

“An expensive drug is not innovation. A drug everyone can use is innovation.” It is time for K-bio to answer the question posed by Hims’ $49 challenge.


This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Investment decisions should be made at your own judgment and responsibility.

Trending now

Latest news

The jeonse renewal right protects tenants. Why does it push up new jeonse prices?

At Olympic Park Foreon, an 84㎡ jeonse (Korea's lump-sum deposit lease) went for KRW 1.65 billion on a new September contract, versus KRW 840 million on a renewal. Renewals start from the old price and only new contracts absorb the higher market rate, yet those who stay...

Meta's AI assistant took off. Why did bank, insurance and gym stocks fall?

On Sept. 22 the Nasdaq hit a record high, but Charles Schwab fell 6.1% and Planet Fitness 9.5%. Investors worried that AI could switch customers who never bothered to switch on their own...

Binance put $100 million into Circle. Why is it the one collecting monthly fees?

Binance bought $100 million of Circle stock, yet Circle will pay Binance a fee every month for five years. More than half of what Circle earns goes out as distribution costs and the like...

A coin up 18,000%: what is Robinhood up to?

Behind PONS, which rose 181 times in under two months, was a setup that uses memecoin trading fees to buy back and destroy its own coin. All of that trading...

Same chips, so why did foreigners buy SK hynix instead of Samsung Electronics?

On the first trading day after the Fed raised rates, foreigners sold more than KRW 2 trillion of KOSPI stocks. The 'switch to net buying' two days later was a single day's worth driven by one stock, SK hynix,...

The US crypto bill stalled in the Senate. How did the SEC open the door to stock tokenization?

Just two days after the Senate blocked a bill setting crypto rules by 49 to 50, the SEC, without changing a single law, opened trading venues for tokenized stocks for five years...